wrote:
On Aug 26, 8:48 am, hk wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:14:56 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:36:38 -0400, DownTime wrote:
Why must I add yet another stupid plug-in this time "Microsoft
Silverlight" to watch the video via Firefox? I tried IE, but its
temporary per session and need to tolerate commercials.
Screw em, I'll pass and will wait for the Youtube version.
Hey, you're missing out on the next Microsoft antitrust saga.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/...y/stream11.php
http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/20/...t-silverlight/
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/m...ves/123837.asp
Does anybody find it highly amusing that Adobe, who in truth, controls
almost 90% of streaming video via Flash and 75% of the digital
video/imagery/text content on the web via CS3 and Reader is ****ed off
about Silverlight being potential competition?
Talk about the pot caling the kettle black. :)
I find "highly amusing" the discussions here about operating systems and
utilities/helper programs, especially the comments about operating
systems certain posters don't use.

I'm less of a fan of Adobe apps than I am of Microsoft apps. The less
"flash" the better.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It always amazes me when someone buys their very first Mac, and all of
a sudden they are experts.. Especially those who know little more
about computers than the opening splash tells them....

After using Vista for a year, even Harry realized Vista sucked and had
to get a Mac. All of the advantages Mac has in a laptop, are also
advantageous in a desktop. Harry hates to admit it, but even he agrees
Vista sucks a green weeny.

The only disadvantage of a MAC is the cost, but the cost saving is only
applicable on a low priced budget PC. When you compare similar systems
a MAC is competitive, maybe slightly more expensive.