On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:24:08 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC,
STP. " wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 01:02:44 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Whew, beat Harry.

It might be Biden.

It doesn't quite fit though and doesn't "help" him in any way.

Maybe it's another head fake like the bumper stickers yesterday.

Since Obama has Biden as VP on his web page, and sent out email and text
messages to all of his supporters, it would be one hell of a head fake.

Why would you selecta guy whose known as a true "insider" if your
message has been hope and change? In some ways, Biden, even with his
over inflated ego, is a better candidate than Obama. It doens't make
sense. This is supposed to be about hope and change - guess that
message has changed.

With respect to Biden, eh. He thinks he's smarter than he really is,
has made some spectacular gaffes over the years and basically called
Obama not only inexperienced, but not very bright - for a black guy.

So much for Hope and Change.

Side note: I just recieved an email from a long time friend who is
active in CT Dem politics - he's wondering if the other vetted VP
selections turned Obama down. That's what he was hearing yesterday I
guess it's a possibility.

So, we've got a Mid-western liberal hooked up with a New England
liberal against an Arizone moderate who hasn't made his pick yet.

I'm holding out for Palin of Alaska - I think that would be a killer
ticket and very easily trump Barry/Biden.

I dont' think it's going to be Romney - too many negatives.