Thread
:
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
View Single Post
#
67
posted to rec.boats.cruising
Ryk
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
headsail furlers -the good, the bad and the ugly...sound off!
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:22:54 -0500, in message
lutions
lid (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:51:51 -0700 (PDT), RichH said:
A headsail on a 'furler' can only be reduced by 30% SA and still
retain any good shape. Beyond 30% reduction and you wind up with a
'BAG" shape instead of a usable sail shape for any 'upwind' work.
135 X .70 = 95% So, you can reduce a 135 down to a 'working
jib' (100%) size without shape problems. A 150 can usually only be
reduced to a 105, et
That's consistent with what I've experienced. I generally end up taking a
second reef in the main before rolling any of the 150 in.
Doesn't that give you a fairly unbalanced helm? That's a lot of CE forward.
It really depends on the rig dimensions. In less than 20 knots on my
Hughes 35 (masthead, large foretriangle, short boom) the heavy one
(135%) with no main at all is well balanced.
Ryk
Reply With Quote
Ryk
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Ryk