wrote:
On Aug 11, 8:58 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Aug 11, 7:40 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
John H. wrote:
Hopefully the trolls will not try to bring it into the sewer like
JohnH..........errr a member here.............tries to stink it up.
Don't you mean until someone took the thread off course with his snarky
comment to Reggie?
I am too stupid to notice a snarky comment. One needs to hit me upside
the head with a 2x4, and then I will just think it is a mosquito.
Whoooooooosh!
(Maybe it *is* an F-18 that keeps buzzing you.) Oh, wow, a *Marine&
F-18!
http://tinyurl.com/58b383
Nice photo, did you take it.
yeah, the same way Harry took the infamous bird photo, he took it from
the owner!!!
Is that a "real" photo or a computer generated image. I think it is
computer generated.
Eisboch
I thought it was a model that had been photoshopped.
You can see some hot spots where the light source was reflected, I would
not expect to see that in a CG image, but I could be wrong.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We have done some 3d work in Corel where we can move light sources
around in the virtual studio..

The flare on the windshield can be easily duplicated in Photoshop, but
the hot spots and shadows under the wings made it look like it was a
photo that had been dodged and burned versus a CG image.

If this is the typical Usenet post, wither it is a manipulated photo of
a real F-18, a CG image or a manipulated photo of the model they are
selling will allow us to "beat this horse within an inch of his life".