...and nowhere do they support your accusation that *I* hired part-time
employees to avoid paying fringe benefits. All my employees are considered
"full-time"...and have been since I started 4 years ago.

Now I'm just "waiting" for an apology.


Already addressed. You claim to follow a personnel policy that differs from
what you have specifically recommended to be the most cost effective, in order
to assure full time benefits for your 32-hour per week employees. Very liberal
of you. You did say, in your reply to NOAH, that anybody who did things
otherwise didn't know much about managing human resources.

As to the hours of your employees vs the employment practices you recommend
that others follow; would have been easy enough to offer that clarification up
front, wouldn't it?