Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:09:37 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

He took those 'down by the lake' or pond, or creek, or something. They
couldn't have been that photographer's pictures or Harry surely wouldn't
have posted them pretending they were his.

Would he?
I think the pro stole them from Harry. It is actually illegal to steal
someone's intellectual property so I hope Harry prosecuted him.

Just in case it actually happened the other way around, we should be
more discrete so the professional doesn't find out.

Nice pictures by the way, always did like the horse.


Thanks.

I guess you are correct about discretion, it would hate to get anyone in
trouble.

It really was a nice owl photo, sitting in the crook of tree, with
Spanish moss draping down. Nice tight shot, PERFECT exposure, and sharp
as a tack.