On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:11:08 +1000, Herodotus
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:57:45 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Jul 21, 5:31*pm, Herodotus wrote:
... I'm going to hide all my science books now and change my
subscription name details to New Scientist and Scientific American.

I first saw a copy of "New Scientist" in the laundry room at the Opua
Marina in New Zealand in 01'. I thought "'New Scientist', eh, that
will be some kind of touchy-feely new age thing, but it should amuse
me while the clothing spins." Little did I know. I've been a
subscriber every since. They go to my brother's house and one of the
joys of home port is the knowledge that there will be a stack of them
waiting for me.

-- Tom.

Yes Tom, its a great magazine. It is not a technical as "Scientific
American" which I have subscribed to since university days. It makes
difficult subjects simple to understand without losing any of the
essential parts.

What I like is that when I am away from home I can just logon on the
web and read the articles anywhere. Nothing like the mental stimulus
and keeping up with developments whilst anchored in a foreign port.

regards
Peter


Good Lord Peter, what kind of magazine are you promoting to poor
innocent readers of the Internet? Figuring "Good Old Peter" is
probably on to something I did a google search for "New Scientist" and
the first thing that popped up was:
"Oral sex-related cancer at 30-year high".







Bruce-in-Bangkok
(correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom)