Capt. JG wrote:
"Stephen Trapani" wrote in message
...
Roger Long wrote:
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote

Bush can read?

OK, OK, it was a cheap shot.
Not a cheap shot at all. Of course he can read. He has however,
admitted on several occasions that he doesn't. If you know what is
right, are firm in your convictions, and are guided by faith and prayer,
there is nothing on paper you need to learn in order to make the right
decisions. Facts are simply confusing and temptations to depart from the
path of righteousness that the lord has laid out for you.

Believe me, this is not satire. I'm absolutely serious.
Gosh when a set-up is this easy, with moralizing about "facts" not getting
in the way of predetermined biases; and with so many people needing to
believe so many false facts to ridicule Bush, I just couldn't let this go.

For those who want to retain their ignorant bias about Bush's reading, I
recommend avoiding this link:

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/ar...7bushbooks.htm

Stephen


Posting the same link yet again?

Sorry, connection problem.

Check this, but don't let your head explode!

http://www.jibjab.com/view/209630

I subscribe to the Maher podcast and have seen and heard him many times.
Was there something in the link having anything to do with what we are
talking about here? If not, why did you recommend it?