On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:33:43 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

wrote:
| On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote:
| Gene Kearns wrote:
| On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
| |Gene Kearns wrote:
| | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
| | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
| | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
| | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.
| |
| |Does said boat in questions exist?
| I don't know, nor do I care.
| I understand, integrity means nothing to you?
|
| I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA
| doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that
| is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are
| intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to
| mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period....
|
|
|
|You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with
|your obsession.

You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped....
assuming you want to.....

Gene, I don't know where you've been, but that "...assuming you want to..."
sure doesn't apply in this case. It's hard for me to believe that you would
think Harry *doesn't* want this group to disappear.

If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication
about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very
naive.

As you can see from Harry's response to your post, he will use anything as
a means to drop some more crap in the group. Those who continue responding
to him simply give him the means to do so.