View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.tall-ships
Bouler Bouler is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,840
Default Link Titanic disaster


"Bouler" schreef in bericht
.. .


One could draw a similar comparison in modern nautical terms between a
huge lake ore carrier or super tanker vs. greyhounds of the fleet such
as destroyers, fast carriers, or even the once proud passenger liners
such as the SS United States or the first Queen Elizabeth. In fact, had
Capt. Smith of the Titanic not been so concerned with setting a new
speed record for a transatlantic crossing on a ship's maiden voyage, he
would have both slowed down and move 100 miles or so south when warned
about the many sightings of icebergs in his path, but he decided to
take the risk because being more conservative but decreasing his risk
would have cost him nearly a day's steaming time, a decision that he
learned to his sorrow was fatal for many hundreds of passengers, crew,
and himself.


They are still investigating on that disaster.
I just read an article (no not on Whacopediagrin) that they were buildin
to many large ships like Titanic and they had not enough good iron for the
rivets and used bad iron rivets for the bow of the Titanic, one of the
reasons the ship sunk so fast.
If I'll find that site I will post it, but I know there are a lot of
rumours about the Titanic.

Here you can read what I wrote.
http://www.abajournal.com/news/titan...ets_book_says/
--
Greetings
Bouler (The Netherlands)