wrote in message
...
On May 1, 2:11 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On May 1, 9:49 am, "D.Duck" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On May 1, 9:03 am, "D.Duck" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Apr 30, 5:59 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:

wrote in message

...

http://my.break.com/Content/view.aspx?ContentID=495726

Finally someone gets it.....

I don't get it. Can you explain just what the guy is saying?

Are you SERIOUS????
You seem to be the only one that doesn't understand what he's saying.
Hell, my thirteen year old understood it.

Is the guy equating the U.S. government leadership as terrorists?

WHOOOSH..........
Never mind, Duck. If you don't get it, you'll never get it.......way
over your head.

If you don't think that jerk is implying that the US government
leadership
are acting like what he thinks terrorists should do to us, you better
check
with your 13 year old.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

whoosh........ again.
If you think that he is implying that ALL US government leadership
personnel are acting like terrorists, my thirteen year old could teach
you quite alot.

======================================

Again your reading comprehension stinks. I don't think you'll find where I
wrote "all". If you do please copy and paste it here.

I bet you want to blame all the US problems one political party. Right or
wrong?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wrong. But I'll bet YOU do.......
Now, you said "the US government leadership", did you not? That is
very simply put, all of them, is it not? It certainly does not say
PART OF "the US government leadership", now does it?

===============================

Analogy. The fishermen were catching fish. Does that mean that "all"
fishermen were catching fish?