If it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, swims like a duck, and
quacks like a duck, then it's a duck. If you and Mark Soverel call it
a duck and it neither waddles nor swims nor quacks, what is it?

wrote:
I guess you didn';t realize that Mark Soverel is dead and no longer
quacks very much.


Yes, I did know. It was widely reported in sailing media.... did you
just now Google it up?
Anyway, I apologize to all if my saying the Soverel 33 is not really a
one-design class, just because Mark Soverel said so, is speaking ill
of the dead.

So, do we take this as your tacit admission that the Soverel 33 isn't
really a one-design, what with the lack of a class and the wide
variation in weight etc etc?




IOW you don't know WTF you're talking about, just being insulting.

Again.

Seems as If I've successfully countered almost every one of your
specious claims,

???

On what planet?
Oh, I know, the one where just making stuff up, & not knowing the
difference between Tartan & Ericson, & not knowing anything at all
about boat's structural properties while pontificating about
flimsiness, means that YOU WIN!! Congrats, BB you've done it again!!


... except to keep saying I don't know WTF I'm talking
about

Only said that once.

Anyway, I hope your friend enjoys his Soverel 33, it's a great boat
and isn't flimsy at all. In fact, they are good heavy-air boats too.

DSK