Thread: The differences
View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
Jere Lull Jere Lull is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,239
Default The differences

On 2008-04-18 23:49:20 -0400, "Vito" said:

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote
They believe in growing government and spending spending spending. They
wish to accomplish this by raising taxes. Their method of balancing the
budget is to raise taxes until they have 90 percent of what people earn.


Gee whiz Wilber, RR, big daddy Bush and now Blundering Bush grew the
government far more than any Democrat since Roosevelt. Worse yet, they did
it by borrowing from countries like China. As a result 3/4 of our national
debt has been incurred by those three administrations. Now we pay more to
service that debt than JFK's first budget. Yes Clinton raised taxes but he
also held down spending and balanced the budget, the first president to do
that since Nixon, despite a borrow & spend Republican Congress.


The Congress determines spending. The President only executes their
orders. (Clinton's was mostly R; Bush's mostly D.) And Clinton had the
benefit of the .COM spike that falsely inflated value and revenue.

Not to mention that the debt is, what, half of its value of a few years
ago due to the devaluation of the dollar?

I'm saddened by those who think the federal debt is so incredibly bad,
though it's a small percentage of GDP (the nation's annual "income").
Most carry debt many times in excess of their income.

When friends get all in a lather on this subject, I simply ask them:
"Could you pay off all your debts tomorrow?" Most of them have negative
net worth, so couldn't even if they cashed everything in. They depend
upon future pay raises, future inflation, to eventually pay their debts
off.

--
Jere Lull
Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/