"Larry" wrote in message
...
Geoff Schultz wrote in
:

So your argument is that CFCs such as R-12 don't interact with the ozone
layer and hasten its demise? I would say that there's a lot of well
established science that would argue with you.



America has gotten rid of R-12 for many many years. The ozone hole is
bigger.

I'm not saying that R-12 isn't a terrible chemical capable of destroying
ozone in the laboratory, where, of course at great expense, all these
facts
fester. What I'm OBSERVING is that the effect of dragging America, at 10
to 15 times the price, into R-134a has been....well......ZERO, just like
most other programs designed to separate the American consumer from his
wealth by the corporate government bureaucrats.

The size of the ozone hole hasn't done what we were told it would do
BECAUSE the 6.2oz of R-12 in my 1973 Mercedes 220D's air conditioner
caused
it. It didn't.



Actually, that's not the case... the ozone hole over Antartica was actually
quite a bit smaller in 2007 as compared to 2006, although it's not enough to
be considered a trend.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1003100537.htm


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com