|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,515
|
|
Think this has anything to do with the economic problems?
"JG2U" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:34:08 -0400, "John" wrote:
"JG2U" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:22:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Mar 18, 12:44 pm, "John" wrote:
So, what do you think Sandy was hiding from the 9-11 commission?
Something of little importance I presume..
**************************8
Not sure but do you think it was anything of this magnitude?
My point is, we will never know. That's all.
Meacher sparks fury over claims on September 11 and Iraq war
September 6, 2003
"...the war on terrorism is a smokescreen and that the US knew in
advance
about the September 11 attack on New York but, for strategic reasons,
chose
not to act on the warnings."
[LINK]
Our boy "John" is a conspiracy loony. It figures.
Conspiracy looney because I question Bush's actions and inconsistencies
surrounding 9/11?
No, partly because you posted as one of your beliefs "that the US knew
in advance about the September 11 attack on New York but, for
strategic reasons, chose not to act on the warnings".
Read that carefully. It doesn't state that Bush was told an attack
might happen, and that it could be done using airplanes, but rather
that our country knew *specifically* about the "September 11" attack,
and for "strategic" reasons allowed it to happen.
In other words, you obviously believe that with specific knowledge of
when and where, and with the ability to stop the attacks, our
government intentially and deliberately allowed the attacks to occur.
You're a nutcase.
Question for you: Considering the news thing below, **and** considering how
simple it was to prevent FURTHER hijackings after 9/11, why do you suppose
the simple measures were not in place immediately after the CIA had its
information?
|