BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Calif Bill

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:36:39 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

I don't know. Lately, I've been reading about PEPs (politically
exposed
people) and SARs (suspicious activity reports). It seems since 9/11,
banks have been using software to spot suspicious activities. The
irony,
is Spitzer, as AG, put pressure on the banks to have more
accountability.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/st...,4637246.story

While $10,000 might not trigger an investigation for everyone. My
colleague who is very well "connected" in NYC, told me that any well
connected person should know that anytime a politician transfers a large
amount of money, it will definitely trigger an investigation, no matter
who they are or what party they are affiliated with. It would not matter
if it was the governor of NY, or the mayor of Paducah or the police
chief of Highland Beach, Md.

My very well connected friend told me they are concerned about illegal
payoffs, bribes, and payola and they definitely would follow up any
politician making those large transfers. My friend was not speculating,
he was just calling it like it is.

There is no $10,000 limit. There isn't a set amount.

It's all software looking for patterns. Which is the exact thing that
Spitzer used to get his bad guys.

The irony is that he didn't understand the system enough to avoid
getting caught himself.

I have been under the impression that a "movement" of 10K or above
triggers a report by the bank to some agency .... I think the IRS. It may
not trigger an investigation for most of us, but my understanding is that
it is still "reported". It has nothing to do with additional surveillance
due to 9/11.

Eisboch

It is $10k cash.