JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Mar 13, 5:03 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:47:01 -0500, John H. wrote:
You might want to consider, Republicans' were rather slow to come
around
to the threat. As I recall, a BJ had all their focus. Remember "Wag
the Dog"?
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...esstional.reac...
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/25/wag-the-dog/
So you believe that Clinton was actually trying to do something other
than divert attention?
Why didn't he finish the job?
Why hasn't GWB? bin Laden is *still* missing.
yukity, yukity, yuk, that's sooooo 2003...Get with it, the mission
changes, like any war...

Translation: Bush blew it, but we don't want to discuss that part of it
anymore.

Blew it? How many successful terrorist attacks on US soil has OBL launched
since 9-11.



You don't have to "attack" to cause devastation, e.g., two TRILLION
dollars wasted on Iraq, 4,000 US soldiers killed, tens of thousands of
Iraqis killed, oil prices at $109 a barrel, the U.S. reputation in the
gutter. Those are some of the results of Bush blowing it.