HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

It doesn't matter. There is nothing Clinton did that begins to
compare with the horrors perpetrated by Dubya.


Some would argue that is because Clinton didn't do much, period.

US interests were attacked many times by terrorists during the
Clinton years with very little action or response on his part.

Eisboch



How many U.S. civilians died as a result of terrorist attacks on U.S.
territory during Clinton's administrations? How many military
personnel were killed or horribly injured during Clinton's
administrations because of his ignorance, arrogance, or intellectual
laziness?

You can't be so naive as to believe what comes out of your addled
brain? You liberals, excuse me progressives, are always harping about
how you have to look beyond the shores of the US for this or that but,
when it may suite your arguments you pull everything back within our
North American borders.


Yes, well, the critical aspect of Bush's presidency was that he was
asleep or on vacation for most of the time before 9-11, ignored advice,
and then proceeded after 9-11 to go after Iraq, the *wrong* country.
Bush is ignorant, arrogant, and intellectually lazy. Hey...those are
pretty much right-wing traits... :)

Ignorant? He has two Ivy League degrees where you have non.

Arrogant? He views on many subjects are different than yours and you see
this as arrogance where more level headed people view this as just
differences of opinion.

Intellectually Lazy? See above.