On Mar 13, 9:00*am, HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

It doesn't matter. There is nothing Clinton did that begins to
compare with the horrors perpetrated by Dubya.

Some would argue that is because Clinton didn't do much, period.

US interests were attacked many times by terrorists during the
Clinton years with very little action or response on his part.

Eisboch

How many U.S. civilians died as a result of terrorist attacks on U.S.
territory during Clinton's administrations? How many military
personnel were killed or horribly injured during Clinton's
administrations because of his ignorance, arrogance, or intellectual
laziness?

You can't be so naive as to believe what comes out of your addled brain?
*You liberals, excuse me progressives, are always harping about how you
have to look beyond the shores of the US for this or that but, when it
may suite your arguments you pull everything back within our North
American borders.

Yes, well, the critical aspect of Bush's presidency was that he was
asleep or on vacation for most of the time before 9-11, ignored advice,
and then proceeded after 9-11 to go after Iraq, the *wrong* country.
Bush is ignorant, arrogant, and intellectually lazy. Hey...those are
pretty much right-wing traits... *:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All of that is bull**** until someone knows what Sandy Burglar was
hiding, and why Jamie Garelic was on the 911 commission. Period.. And
btw, who was pres when they blew my friend Steven Tingley and a couple
of hundred other good marines out of their beds in Beruit?