One must wonder...
hk wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting
adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved
in the relationship.
Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.
We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't
believe that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should
be the business of the law, or even the general public.
I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if
he sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay
for his fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted
for that, but not for the sex.
I think prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized, but i would
never recommend we just ignore those crimes we don't agree with. I
guess that is one of the things you and will just disagree.
If prostitution is decriminalized, well, then, it isn't a crime, is it?
Stupid laws should be fought. If we followed your example, we'd still
have segregation.
We have an established way to change those laws you call stupid. It is
called the legislative process. You are free to encourage your
Democrat brothers and sisters to offer a bill decriminalizing
prostitution. Or, you can go and have a state or municipality enact a
law decriminalizing prostitution.
I am suprised the party of low morales and no ethics, the Democrat
party, hasn't gotten this accomplished yet.
There is *nothing* a prostitute does that compares in depravity to what
Bush and Cheney have perpetrated on this country and the world.
Right.
|