posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,115
|
|
One must wonder...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:40:52 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:10:46 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:31:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news:EI2dnWbACPl_WEranZ2dnUVZ_vTinZ2d@comca st.com...
HK wrote:
Valgard Toebreakerson wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H.
wrote:
why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a
Democrat,
although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a
Republican is
involved in a sex scandal.
It couldn't be media bias, could it?
http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms
The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats
may
lose
their base.
Got a better one for you.
Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political
affiliation the mayor of Detroit is.
Oh - the reason?
He's involved with the murder a hooker.
And covering/obstructing the investigation.
Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political
party
because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family
values,"
and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the
various
sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My
favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays.
One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat
party
has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct.
Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the
bar
aren't a great party, that's the Democrats.
Democrats are less likely to suggest that people live like families
which
only exist in books written for toddlers.
From what I've seen, you could put your period after the word
'families'
in
your sentence above.
--
John
That's because you're lying. Or, because you don't see much. Don't fret
about it. It's a plague.
You, Harry, and JimH sure seem to want to put a lying moniker on me.
I don't do it, and I don't much like those who do.
When I look at the out of wedlock birth statistics in DC and then look
at
the percent of Democrats in DC, I get the idea that families don't mean
much.
IOW, Democrats are less likely to suggest people live like families.
--
John
I get the idea you either flunked statistics, or never bothered to take a
course. Fortunately, your lack of knowledge in that area affects nobody
but
yourself.
IOW, nothing.
--
John
In other studies, income level is correlated to out of wedlock births. Your
"study" seems to point to something nobody else has ever noticed: political
labels. Maybe you should get in touch with some of the bigger polling
companies and inform them of your discovery.
Do you know the difference between cause and correlation?
I'm not referring to 'studies'. I'm referring to facts.
--
John
|