On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:06:47 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:00:10 -0500, John H.
wrote:

I can't understand all this wailing at Republicans. The damn New York Times
is sure as hell not a Republican newspaper! The headlines for the last two
days have not been 'Spitzer friendly'.

Pure speculation on my part, but there is an interesting aspect to
this whole imbroglio.

Spitzer busted some big prostitution rings. Normally, prostitution
enterprises like this are mob connected, if not run by same.

The two really big ones Spitzer busted were connected to the Genovese
crime family which specialised in this type of activity.

The other organization that is connected to this particular "industry"
is the Bonanno crime family.

In theory one could wonder if Spitzer was "protecting" his favorite
escort service on behalf of the Bonanno's?

In particular where he had been utilizing these professional services
for at least six years and quite possibly ten or more?

Being close to Redneck status, I've no knowledge of all these families.
But, it *is* an interesting theory.

You could use the word 'may' a few times and get a good story going. Hell,
the NYT might buy it, unless they're owned by the Bonanno's also.

Something like, "Spitzer may have been protecting his favorite escort
service on behalf of the Bonanno's."
--
John