On Mar 10, 8:43*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:35:30 -0700 (PDT),





wrote:
On Mar 10, 8:32*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:19:50 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Is there a device or TV that keeps volume level or at least
constrained? My kid is trying to watch a movie on FX and the volume
fluxuation is so severe that we can't even let my kid watch it as we
are trying to have phone conversations with clients in the next room..
One second it needs to be at volume level 45, the next 18-20 is
plenty.. This is rediculous, can't even watch the TV we pay 100 bucks
a month for.. Crap...

It's not the volume actually - the signal input never varies.

What changes is the frequency of the audio.

Very clever.

The frequency of the audio? *Wouldn't that make the voices sound unnatural.

I do a lot of radio station time shifting via the Internet. *I like to
listen to programs from the old home town at night. *I have the same problem
with audio level differences between commercials and the programming.

I took of the files I downloaded and loaded it into Cool Edit Pro. *Sure
enough, the audio amplitude level between the commercials and the
programming is significantly different.

Just my observations.

It's true. *The shift is to slighty higher, sharper tones and
frequency - you really wouldn't notice it.

The other reason is that in addition to the slight frequency shift,
the audio is leveled such that it's loud all the time.

The FCC regulates how loud a commercial can be and it can be no louder
than the highest audio level reached in the show. *The same with
frequency.

However, the FCC doesn't regulate the audio level for commercials - so
with the slight shift in frequency bringing sharper audio, the levels
are at the loudest level produced during the broadcast itself.

Net effect - louder commercials even though they aren't louder than
the broadcast.

Like I said, very clever.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Several years back there was a Motorola tv that was advertized with a
"fix" for the problem. It dissapperard almost as fast as it came, more
likely someone bought the technology and patent and buried it.. Like
the ad agencies or cable companies..

Never knew that.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Want another one. Me and dad and the rest of my family pretty much
stopped taking long showers this winter as we were told by our furnace
tech that there was a valve we might need to replace as time went on
that "seemed bad" but it was not covered in our 500 dollar a year
service contract so I was going to wait till spring and do it myself,
we figured after 20 years we might just get a new boiler. Not having
been here that long, I did not realize how drastically it changed that
day. Anyway, as many of you know, I and you did not know, dad both got
pretty sick this year, with lung and sinus problems.. Not having hot
water for showers, sink, anywhere else made things worse. Not to
mention we wen through almost 30% more oil this year than last year.
So anyway, the other day I started feeling better so I did a new
shower in my dad's bathroom, went down stairs to look things over and
found that they had our high low water temp settings at 155 - 175 and
they set that the day they were here, last fall when I was not really
paying attention.. No wonder we used so much oil, trying to heat a
house in winter with 155 degree water, we are all furious right now..
I may have been able to stay healthy and might even be still working
with my horsies if I could have had hot showers every night after
work.. I am calling Blumental tomorrow.. It was a real scam, and now
that I look back it was absolutely intentional in my opinion..