View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
[email protected] PlaysWithSharks@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 61
Default Pelosi - most ethical Speaker in history

On Mar 8, 1:51*pm, DownTime wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 8, 12:41 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 7, 8:17 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:52 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:37 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Valgard Toebreakerson" wrote in message
news:1on3t31t4pl0te100o29g4q45q377v4t1k@4 ax.com...
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics....archive/200803...


Ah yes - the smell of ethics and high moral and political
standards.
Now...how long will it take for the usual, what a lousy
President George
Bush is?
3....2....1....
Too late.
In case you missed it...
George W. Bush, the worst president in the known universe.
Well, your ideology driven speculation is expected. The currant
congress will certainly go down as the dirtiest and most corrupt in
history..
Not even in the running.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So what do you have to say about Pelosi putting a criminal like
Jefferson ( you admitted that yourself) in charge of the committe
holding the purse strings of the FBI office investigating him. There
is not an honest person in the world that could say this was not
corruption at the higest level, wonder how much Pelosi got for that
one.. Any related comments Harry?
You know what? I have a hard time differentiating between the
crookedness of Jefferson and the crookedness of the FBI. I do know this,
though: the FBI's crookedness has done far more harm to this country
over the years than Jefferson's alleged thievery.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Blah, blah, last chance, what do you have to say about the Jefferson/
Pelosi issue? Or will you simply ignore it on politics alone?


I've already stated I think Jefferson is a crook who got caught with his
hands in the freezer. He should have resigned.


My only argument with Pelosi is that she hasn't been tough enough on the
*Bush Administration.


It's probably because she is to busy sponsoring legislation to directly
* benefit her husband's bank accounts. I mean one woman can only do so
much.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Don't forget holding on to the pharma stocks so her and Billary can
short em' again..