On 29 Aug 2003 05:10:10 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 28 Aug 2003 05:10:07 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 27 Aug 2003 04:05:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message And you're wrong again. Making up this strawman is showing you to be an
idiot who can't even comprehend simple english. Of course I said I was
guilty of neglect. But you're wrong when you claim that I later said it
wasn't the case. I did indeed simply decide not to change them at that
time. THAT is where I was guilty of neglect, by deciding not to change
them. Apparently this plain and simple concept is way over your head
.. just like everything else.

Hoohoo!!! This is just getting TOO funny! EVERY time...you are caught,
dead to rights in a damned lie, and try and try to Rush you way out of
it!!!

You are the only one caught dead to rights in a damned lie, several
times ... Walt the guy who doesn't read a 2 line post before he replies
to the exact subject in the 2 lines,

Let's see, first you are "guilty of neglect". Then you tell me, when I
brought it up, that no, you weren't neglecting it, you simply decided

You'll have to provide proof of where I said I wasn't neglecting it.

Okay, here, on 08/20/03 at 20:32 PST, Shelikoff wrote:
Unfortunately, this is one area many people neglect. I've been guilty
of it myself.

THEN you said, after I said it takes a real simpleton to neglect the
zincs, you came back with:

I told you above, I just didn't
bother to change the pencil zinc on the heat exchanger.

So you see, you are a liar.

I said you need to provide proof of where I said I WASN'T neglecting it.
You haven't done that yet. Here, all you've done is provide solid proof
that you are to stupid to realize that "just not bothering to change
something" that needs changing is the same thing as being "guilty of
neglect" for not changing something that needs changing. Maybe you need
to go to your daughter for some help again.

Steve

Jeez, you ****ing simpleton, can you not read? LOOK at the above crap
from you. I said, it took a real simpleton to neglect the zincs. YOU
said, that wasn't the case, you simply didn't bother. Which is it?
Either you neglected them, ie: forgot, too preoccupied, etc. or was it
that you just "didn't bother" ie: I don't feel like it.

Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same
thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something...
Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even
related. I suggest you look up the definition of neglect, here's a link
if you don't feel like digging up the dictionary:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=neglect
Nowhere in there will you see the word "forget" or "forgot". In fact,
most of the examples given for neglect are things that one knows should
be done, but just didn't do.

For instance, when someone leaves an 8 year old alone in the house for a
few days while they go off to hunt someone else down, they are guilty of
neglecting their child EVEN IF they didn't forget they have a child.
Most people who are guilty of neglecting children don't forget they have
kids or forget they are supposed to take care of them. And yet, they
are still guilty of neglect because they just "didn't bother" or "didn't
feel like it."

You are a complete, unmitigated asshole. You are SO wrong, and realize
that you are wrong, that you need to bring my family into it? What a
piece of **** you are.

And you are a stupid moron who, in his exuberance to point out somewhere
I might have lied has only shown that you're to dumb to even understand
the meaning of the word "neglect". I hope I've helped you understand
the meaning of a new word for you.

Steve