Tim wrote:
On Feb 29, 10:11 pm, BAR wrote:
Tim wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
I'm a bit rusty on this, but I believe Tito
thought he could make socialism work in Yugoslavia without involving the
evils he saw in the USSR & China. A quick google search for "tito
yugoslavia" reveals a vast amount of disagreement about whether he succeeded
or not.
Evidently he didn't do too good of a job at his attempt. If I rememebr
correctly, Wasn't he proven to be one of the most corrupt of Eastern
bloc dictators..?
That was the guy in Romania.

Oh, I know the difference between Josip "Tito" Bronz and Milosovic.

But the ws I see it is that Tito didn't like the "ruskie way of
communism, and went to fight the corruption, but had a highly corrupt
dictatorship.

Milosovic? He was corrupt all right, but he wasn't as corrupt as he
was an evil butcher.







Romania's dictator from the Soviet era was Nicolae Ceausescu.