"Phil Abuster" wrote in message
...
In some areas of the country cars undergo rigorous emissions testing -
good for the environment, good for people and delaying the inevitable
onslaught of global warming. Why aren't boats tested annually? They burn
much more fuel than a car. In fact, boat exhaust has hurt people on the
water:
http://havasumagazine.com/carbonmonoxide.htm
Even killed:
http://www.scma.com/news/dec03.pdf
And is common:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/410537_3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/en... ndexed=google
http://www.dbw.ca.gov/PressRoom/2003/030606CO.aspx
Pollution from boats is extreme:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=5186090
The EPA wants to do something:
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsst...te=30-Jun-2004
But the special interests of the boating lobby ($$$manufacturers$$$) are
working with payola to keep profits high at the expense of boater's
health. Is it unreasonable to require and annual emission test and follow
up remediation for every boat? I believe boaters should be responsible for
their carbon footprint as well as their impact on other's health. A great
thing would be a buy back of 2 cycle engines, similar to the buy back of
guns.
While all your assumptions are incorrect..
If they were correct, wouldn't the sailboat owner get a rebate?