Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:20:15 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:09:14 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

BAR wrote:
hkrause wrote:
JimH wrote:

Post a couple of pics of the current conditions and you will remove
all doubt Harry. A lobby and lounge pic would do the trick.

Can you do it?

Eat me, Reggie. :)

http://tinyurl.com/2gj3bk
Photoshop!
Harry has told us he is trim and lean and has gotten his weight down to
165lbs. Looking at that hand, Harry must only be about 3' tall.
Pudgy little bugger!
I can hear Harry's doctor telling him "Harry I am not saying you are too
fat, you are just too short for your weight. Now if you were 8'6" you
would be just right."

ROTFL!!!

Believe it or not my GP, who is a great gal and funny as all get out,
said the same thing to me 12 years ago.

We had a neighbor who had this VERY FAT baby. Was in the 10% of length,
and in the top 99% of weight. She honestly said, and believed, the baby
is just too short for her weight.

When I asked her why she weighed so much she said "I don't know, she
doesn't eat much and all we give her to drink is this glucose water",
when I told her that it was sugar water, she said well someone gave us
cases of it for free, so I hate to not use it.

Some people should be sterilized.