On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:01:57 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:41:02 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:02:06 -0800, jps wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:46:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:22:57 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:55:31 -0500, John H.
wrote:

from an otherwise not well known source, The Aspen Times:

http://tinyurl.com/36nrxx

He could have left off the part about Hillary, and the country would have
understood his message anyway.

A friend of mine, lifelong Republican, sent me the link to this same
article the other day -- he was astonished that anything this stupid
would be published. "Only in America" were his words.

I explained to him that the Aspen Times was likely targeted at
construction workers and maids and not to worry.

Unfortunately, the intenet makes distribution of crap like this widely
available -- mostly by agents of intolerance, as they'd be termed by
John McCain.

jps

Shows your friend has good taste, and you should pay attention.

The internet is way cool, isn't it?

Weren't you the "agent" in this case and what does that say about your
taste?

jps

Same as your friend's...good!

My friend was embarassed that such a piece of trash could be published
by any source in America.

He's a lifelong Republican, voted for Bush twice. Still has sense
enough to recognize intolerant trash when he sees it.

Unlike you.

jps

Bull****. I recognize intolerant trash. Put some up, and I'll show you.

Or, better yet, tell us which part(s) of the article you found to be
'intolerant trash'.


--
John H