View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,435
Default A new twist to the Democratic Superdelegates

Obama, Clinton Shower Cash on Delegates
Email
Share February 14, 2008 5:30 PM

ABC News Rick Klein Reports: They're by far the most influential 796
Democratic voters in the country, and they're being . . . showered with
cash by the two remaining Democratic candidates?

It's not quite as unseemly as it sounds. But an eyebrow-raising study
from the Center for Responsive Politics shows that "superdelegates" have
received at least $890,000 in political contributions from Sen. Barack
Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton -- going back to 2005 -- with
Obama sending a larger share of cash to the influential party insiders.

The study found that Obama has sent more than $694,000 from either his
campaign account or his political action committee to superdelegates --
the members of Congress, governors, and other party leaders who receive
automatic votes at the Democratic National Convention.

About 40 percent of the elected officials who have endorsed Obama have
received campaign contributions from him, the center reports. Those
superdelegates have received a total of $228,000 from him.

By contrast, Clinton sent out only $195,500 to superdelegates, and only
12 percent of her superdelegates received money from her for their
campaigns, according to the report.

And quantities may count.

"In cases where superdelegates had received contributions from both
Clinton and Obama, all seven elected officials who received more money
from Clinton have committed to her," the report states. "Thirty-four of
the 43 superdelegates who received more money from Obama, or 79 percent,
are backing him."

While such contributions are perfectly legal, they shine a light on
another element of the little-understood process by which the Democratic
Party chooses a nominee: Superdelegates could determine the nomination,
and many of them are politicians themselves, with their own reelection
campaigns to worry about when they make their choices.