On Feb 13, 3:02*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:57:41 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 13, 1:33*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:17:15 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 13, 7:13*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
That loud sucking sound heard in Potomic area was Hillary losing 3 more
primaries.

It looks like the only way Hillary will win the primary is if Billary
can steal this away with super delegates and some rule changes.

Nah, as far as delegates, she's really not that far behind. The media
spin, however makes it look like Obama is just running away with the
nomination.

Perhaps because he is passing her at warp speed. Look where things
were a month ago. It's not really attributable to spin no matter how
much you might wish it was. Hillary's in the breakdown lane and
Barack's in the passing lane.

At the instant when a car going 100 mph passes a car going 30, do you
interpret them to be doing about the same thing as each other?

The statement that I was replying to was this:

It looks like the only way Hillary will win the primary is if Billary
can steal this away with super delegates and some rule changes

They aren't far apart. So let's use your analogy, shall we? What
happens if the car going 100 mph slows to a crawl, and the car doing
30 speeds up considerably long before the end of the race? See, pretty
simple!

It's so simple you have failed to understand the concept completely.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No.......
You've failed. using your analogy, tell me what would happen in my
scenario.