"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:26:17 -0500, Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:


They were started because of the 68 Convention, and because every time
they had a brokered convention, they hurt themselves so badly, they lost
the general election. The Republican's use a winner take all delegate
program in many states so it won't go to a broker convention. Since
this follows the general election, I think it makes more sense than
Super Delegats who can overide the entire primary system.

With all this talk of the Democrat's Super Delegates, it's interesting to
note, the Republicans will have the same percentage of *unpledged*
delegates at their convention. Although, in the case of Republicans,
it's dependent on the way the states designate their delegates.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/hor...republica.html


My guess is that the "Super Delegate" buzz is just something the media is
using to try to build up more interest (and ratings) in political
coverage.
How lucky the super delegates are. They can vote as they please without
worrying about the will of the people or being accused of accepting bribes
or of influence peddling, or making deals under the table. Pure and simply
the best way to represent the people. At least that is the way Harry looks
at it.