View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Chuck Gould Chuck Gould is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default Questions from the USCG OUPV or 100-ton exam

On Feb 13, 5:07�am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:26:21 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:00?pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message


. ..


On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:55:07 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


Kinda ****ed me off, but there's really nothing
that can be done about it. ?In a boat sale, the buyer holds all the cards
... ?the seller just has to adjust.


That's not completely true. ?If the purchase agreement is properly
worded, and the terms breached, you can walk with the deposit.
A subtle suggestion or two of that possibility could do wonders to
expedite the closing.


But, isn't it interesting that the typical 10 percent deposit just happens
to cover the broker's commission?


Most agreements split the forfeited deposit between the broker and the
seller, up to the amount that would have been due the broker had the
sale gone through.


What? �You're kidding.

Why the heck should the broker get any money for a failed sale?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Good question, and the answer is that the broker performed the service
he or she agreed to perform; bring an apparentl ready, willing, and
able buyer to contract. The broker has a financial investment in the
sale, and has a series of expenses to recover.

The only time that a buyer's deposit is normally forfeited is when the
sale fails due only to an arbitrary change of heart on the part on the
part of the buyer, ("We've decided to buy a motorhome instead,
sorry"), or when the buyer has made a misrepresentation ("I hate to
admit this, but I lied from the very beginning about having enough
cash to buy a boat."). Neither of those situations is the fault of the
broker.

If the sale falls apart without any forfeiture of deposit (due to
survey or financing contingencies in the original contract), then the
broker gets the same as the seller; nothing.

One of the situations that a broker must *always* guard against is a
back-door deal between the seller and buyer after the broker has done
his or her job;

Phone rings:

"Hello, Mr. Boat Buyer? This is Mr. Boat Seller."

"Oh, hello. What can I do for you?"

"How would you like to save another $5000 on the cost of the boat?"

"Well of course! But how would I do that? Are you planning to lower
the price?"

"No, I'm selling it too cheaply already. You're getting a whale of a
deal.
But what I think I can do to help to both of us to to reduce my
expense of selling the boat. Let's enter into a deal where we agree to
do business at a selling price of $5000 less than you have offered
through the yacht brokerage, and then you call the yacht broker and
tell him that you have been unable to qualify for "acceptable"
financing so the deal is off. I'll save $12,000 in selling expense by
cutting the broker out of the transaction, and I'll pass $5,000 of
that along to you."

"Make it six thousand, and you've got a deal."


Splitting the buyer's forfeited deposit (up to the amount of the
commission) offers some assurance that the seller won't talk the buyer
into forfeiting the deposit and then buying the boat at a cheaper
price
once the supposedly "angry" seller pulls the listing following a
failed sale.