I think that you got my posts confused with some others, as you just
agreed with what I said.


"Trainfan1" wrote in message
...
Doug,

The R.A.V.E. valve is on the exhaust side of the Rotax engines, the
rotary
valve is on the intake side. Many of the Rotax mills are of a reed
valve
design(still in conjunction with the RAVE), now, as are all of the
Suzukis(Arctic Cats), Yamahas, and Fujis(Polaris). I personally have
had
very good experience with the rotary valved Rotax... good power and
great
reliability. Seeing also that about 30 years ago, Bombardier bought
all
remaining shares of Rotax they did not yet own, I doubt they will
install
any different power in their vehicles.

Rob
*
*
*

"Doug Meredith" wrote in message
...

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
Bulletproof? Right. Unfamiliar with Rotax marine engines.... I
told
a friend that they seemed to make a pretty good engine for the
Experimental Aircraft market.

He bought the boat and within a year both engines were toast
because
the engineers designed the carburetors to be (carbs?) cooled with
raw
water.

Let's see.... zinc bearing metal and sea water.... whatta we got
here?

Nope. He doesn't use the term "bulletproof" to describe them.


I've had 6 Ski-Doo's all of course with the Rotax engine zero
problem.
As far as RAVE goes, it must not be any good. Thats why the other
builders have copied it.

Sea-Doo had a problem with one of their 900 cc class engines in
their
PWC's. Since fixed.