Calif Bill wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 10, 11:35 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

.. first 1/2 was great
acting and some thought. Last 1/2 was both weird and no real conclusion.
How it gets critical acclaim as one of the best movies of the year is
either
because the rest of the crop is really bad, or there are different
criteria
used by the professional critics.


Sounds kind of like you're describing the 2008 Presidential race,
doesn't it...?

Not sure the first 1/2 has been any good either.

I supposed that's to be decided by the local critics.