GW isn't going to help the Great Lakes much this year..
Stephen Trapani wrote in news:dncrj.3116
:
Any reason saboteurs trying to secretly collapse buildings would go to
great trouble to make them "collapse in their footprint" like a
controlled demolition?
The WTC was an awful white elephant. It was losing millions/day and was
lightly occupied. The buildings around WTC are owned by powerful people
with a lot to lose if the building just fell over. Why would they want the
WTC to collapse straight down, including Building 7?
Would saboteurs care? Of course not! They'd want to take out as many
buildings as the WTC towers could reach! You answered your own question,
they came straight down to MINIMIZE DAMAGE to some very rich corporations.
This also holds true at the Pentagram. Why would an Arab terrorist, who
was headed into the Pentagram on the side where the JCS and Rumsfeld's
office was located right behind the flagpole....FLY ALL THE WAY AROUND THE
OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO FLY IT INTO AN AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH
NO PENTAGRAM BUREAUCRATS TO KILL?! If you wanted to take out the top of
the American military machine, wouldn't the nose of that jet want to point
right into Rumsfeld's office window?
They took out the only part of the Pentagram UNDER CONSTRUCTION to MINIMIZE
BUREAUCRAT DAMAGE.....only construction workers were killed. No top brass,
not a single colonel was harmed in the attack! What a great coincidence,
eh? The location of the JCS and Rumsfeld's office is on thousands of
websites across the net. ANY terrorist going to this much trouble would
know EXACTLY which window was his.....and blow it to hell!
|