"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:53:40 -0500, HK wrote:

D.Duck wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

I've always been a McCain fan and if he can keep it together, he's
pretty viable as an alternative.
I also have a lot of respect for McCain. His only drawback is 25
years in the Senate.

Eisboch

Not me. He has a short fuse and he carries many liberal views,
including wanting to do away with waterboarding the captured
terrorists, even though even 30 seconds of doing so to high profile
terrorists resulted in tremendous information.

As you said, he is also long in the tooth and represents the same
old
same old.

The Republicans did not offer any true conservative candidates this
election.

Being in favor of torture is a conservative view?

No wonder I don't like conservatives.
Serious question. I don't know much about waterboarding. Does it
leave
any lasting physical or physiological effects?

Nope. It has proven to be effective within 30 seconds and has resulted
in
solid information that resulted in stopping future terrorist attacks.

Torture? Nope.........but very effective according to reports on the
use
of this technique on captured terrorists.


I've done some quick reading via Google and so far all I've found is
opinions that there can be lasting effects.




The conservatives who support waterboard don't give a damn about that,
and, of course, they are in denial about its impact, too.

I'd be happy to see waterboarding approved right after the entire Bush
and Cheney families subject themselves to it and tell us it is no biggie.

Various reporters have undergone waterboarding and don't seem to be any
the
worse for it.
--
John H

Krause seems to think torture is sinful except when applied to Republicans.
Go figure. He's a piece of work.