"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...


Politicians always do that. Nature of the beast.
What I found most interesting is the contention that the Clinton
administration was essentially a continuation of Reagan policies,
which Obama was at least hinting at when he said Bill Clinton was not
a "transformative" character.

--Vic


I can understand that.

There was somebody discussing H. Clinton and B. Obama differences today on
one of the endless TV political coverage interviews. I don't remember who
it was, but he made some good points, including (paraphrasing):

The "wellness" factor of the USA (economic and otherwise) is a function of
the spirit and moral of her population. This characteristic is almost unique
compared to the more traditional acceptance of conditions in other
countries.
We tend to be more forward thinking, ready to embrace new ideas, new
technology and new outlooks. And we like to be liked.

Ronald Reagan understood and tapped into that spirit. He really didn't
change things much. He simply provided inspiration and confidence at a time
that the nation needed a spiritual vitamin. Barack Obama is doing the same
thing. I think he also understands the enormous potential of this country
to heal itself, given the inspiration, and that is what he was alluding to
in his recent comments about Reagan that raised so many eyebrows. I think
it's also why Obama is less specific about the details, whereas H. Clinton
is going to micromanage and dictate a "recovery". I think Obama has the
right attitude.

Eisboch