"Jim" wrote in message
...

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
Tim wrote:
John, it will still all be Bush's fault.

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:38:37 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..

Delightfully, it doesn't matter to me whether Hillary or Barack
wins,
since I will be happy with either in the White House.
It would be very interesting and refreshing to see you "happy".
Somehow I doubt it will ever happen though, regardless of the
election
outcome.

Eisboch

It will be fun to watch Harry bitch when the Democrats are in charge
and
the USA is going to hell in a hand basket.
--
John H

This country already is in hell in a hand basket. Either Barack or
Hillary will be a huge improvement.
You are just reading cue cards. Do you have any thoughts of your own
that might justify her being president? Bet you don't.

What if there were only two candidates right now: Hillary, with her
current senate experience, and Bush-2, with his experience as governor
of Texas.

Which would you consider to be more qualified for the White House?
Obama


Somebody bring Kanter up to date. Have him imagine which real candidate
would look best having a fireside chat with a foreign head of state. Which
candidate would be best suited to deal with fiscal responsibility. which
candidate's might put personal gain out of the picture while making
important decisions. Have Kanter choose any measure he likes to determine
if The Clintons are the best candidate.

Two questions:

1) Do you know who earned the nickname "Bandar Bush", and why?

2) Are you OK with Bush being socially inept, to the point of fondling the
leader of another country? It's true. I just want to know if that's
acceptable to you.