"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.