On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New
Orleans.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the
House
of Representatives thought otherwise:
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55

Articles about the crimes committed by the police:
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/
http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836

NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police:
http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177



"Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was
issued
after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while
flying
over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible
for
these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed
over
when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the
wake
of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in
Alabama,
Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were
recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if
they
could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were
outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)"

Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry
about.
--
John H


What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the
House
of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****.


My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh
perfect one?
--
John H


Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read
completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse.
Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses.


Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says
something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it?

Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well
with your outfit.
--
John H