BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Jim

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
JG2U wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:11:39 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:45 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from
the Bush
Admin.
In 1998?
Eisboch
Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to
decide
to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy."
Yet most of the influencial Democrats in Congress promoted such
action at
the time, a fact you seem to refuse to recognize.
"You fellows keep missing the real points.
" One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard
on to
invade, ......"
Stop. Again, most leading Dems advocated such action well
before Bush
took office.
The fact that Clinton didn't is somewhat of a mystery.
Maybe Bill didn't trust the intel. I wouldn't trust a word from
certain
federal intel or police agencies, e.g., the FBI.

That's only cause you have the ear of the Supreme Overlord...

No, it is because I believe the FBI is a corrupt agency.

--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!
Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like?

harry is the original disenfranchised voter.

Everything is corrupt except labor unions, their affiliated organizaitons,
and the DNC in Harry's eyes.

Unfortunately, Harry has it all bass ackwards. Somebody did a good job
brainwashing him.