"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..

It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.



In 1998?

Eisboch



Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to decide
to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy."

Yet most of the influencial Democrats in Congress promoted such action at
the time, a fact you seem to refuse to recognize.



"You fellows keep missing the real points.

" One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard on to
invade, ......"


Stop. Again, most leading Dems advocated such action well before Bush
took office.
The fact that Clinton didn't is somewhat of a mystery.



".... and it was the Bush Admin that cooked the books to "justify" an
invasion,"

For the same justifications outlined by the Dems in 1998. Who cooked the
books?




"it was the Bush Admin that decided to invade "light" of the necessary
troops to handle the
aftermath, and it has been the Bush Admin that has screwed up just about
everything in and about Iraq since."


Valid criticism, although it's tactical and not stragegic




Bush is the worst president in this country's history, and he's going to
prove it every day until he is out of office.

Keep repeating that Harry if it makes you feel good. Only history will tell
the real story.

Eisboch