Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:28:51 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.
It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,
I've seen all that crap a zillion times.
Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.
I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.
I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?
Most of those you wonder about were supplied intel by the Bush Admin.
But you know what? It doesn't matter what they did. Bush is the one who
lied to get his war started.

Unfortunate. It would appear that you can't give a honest answer to
an honest question.

Thought better of you actually.

Oh well...


It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.

--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!