On Jan 25, 7:06*pm, JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:59:32 -0500, hk wrote:
JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:12:35 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"JG2U" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:00:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
.. .
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
.. .
"Red Flounder" wrote in message
news:c5dhp3ligp3u2si905etgab7v4cu5f1870@4 ax.com...
and marital infidelity?

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...4/NEWS05/80124...

Damn Democrats can't keep it in their pants apparently.

Compared to last year's Republican gay sex adventures, it's nothing.
Really.

It doesn't? *Did the *"last year's Republican gay sex adventures" cost
the taxpayers $9 million?

Tell me how much it cost taxpayers to manage these assholes:

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...publicanHypocr...

Aany of those felonies? *Did any cost $9 million? *How much did
Congressman Jefferson cost us?

The legal matters on that page cost taxpayers a total of $42 million
dollars. Thanks for asking. Now you can deal with the actual facts that
are
important, rather than the ones which are not.

So? *The total cost of the clinton impeachment for the American public
was about 40 Million, for *one* liberal scumbag.

Now you know.

Thank you for helping me make my point. Now, explain to Bill that the
severity of a crime has nothing to do with the cost of prosecuting the
crime.

The fact that it was the POTUS, and was impeachment, means the crime
was severe, so it cost a lot. *Your point failed.

You'd think that after seven years of incredible disasters perpetrated
on us by the Bush Administration, the jack-offs of the world would have
moved on from Bill Clinton's sex life.

But, no. I suppose that's what makes a Jack Goff a jack-off.

News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with a fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You mean the Bozo's Bin?