wrote in message
...
On Jan 25, 10:10 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 25, 9:17 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jan 25, 9:10 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jan 25, 8:30 pm, hk wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:49:47 -0500, hk
wrote:

JG2U wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:16:29 -0500, hk
wrote:

JG2U wrote:
News for harry... Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex with
a
fat
chick.

Oh, and your "filter" is acting up again.
Sure he was. Oh, technically, it was related to "lying under
oath"
about
sex. Y-A-W-N. The whole business was nothing more than a GOP
witch
hunt
to "get" Clinton, and wasn't worth even an asterisk.

It was uncovering the tip of an iceberg, and that's just all
they
could get him for. He and Monica could have gone at it until
they
were both blind, and if he had not committed perjury, there
wouold
have been no impeachment. Period.

Had the Repubs not been out to "get" Bill on "something," there
would
have been no impeachment, period. After trying for years, all the
Repubs
could do was nail him because he lied about sex.

I can hardly wait for the subpoenas and grand juries next year.
They
won't be about sex or lying about sex, either.

Thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands wounded because of
Liberal
lies.

You forgot this:

That wouold be great. Their facilitators are Albright, Clinton,
Dean,
Berger, Reid, Billary, Pelosi, Biden, and all the other libs who
were
beating the war drum for Iraq even before Bush was elected.

Remember this video?

Bush and Cheney lied, and thousands died, and for nothing.- Hide
quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Blah,blah, blah....... blah, blah... Bush shot back, tough ****.
Why do you think the oil is going up again, now? Who do you think the
oil rich sponsors of terrorism want in office, republicans who shoot
back or democrats who will not? duh, math is constant, one and
one is always two...

=======================

Oil: Which time period are you referring to? Examples: "today", or
"the
last 48 hours", that sort of thing.

I've been hittin' the Red Rose tea pretty hard for the past hour, so
I'm
pretty ****ed up. I'm not following what you are connecting to the
"oil
going up" idea. Can you clarify?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

pfffffttttt...

====================

Great. You type these things and hit the "send" button before making
sure
you can explain them. You must be embarrassed, although you will pretend
that you somehow "won".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not at all, I just don't feel like playing with drunks tonight...

=======================

Anyone who disagrees with you is a drunk, especially if they point out
your
stupidity. I understand now.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Loogis, Chuck, Jim, Harry, Salty, are just a few of the others here
who disagree with me all the time, you are the only one I think is a
drunk.. and not worth engaging...

===================

But, you keep engaging me. Why is that?

And, when you call me a drunk, you are ****NEVER**** able to address the
reason why. That's amusing. You're like a child having a tantrum.