On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:03:36 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
m...

"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Absurd. Bush is the worst president ever. Either of the Clintons would do
a better job. The roadkill I passed early this morning would do a better
job.



It would be really interesting to read some of the historical accounts and
opinions of both B.Clinton and GWB's presidencies 50 years from now when
all those whose personal interests are long dead and buried.

Unfortunately, most of us won't be here either.

Eisboch


You don't need to wait that long for "interesting". If you're a member of
the minority who actually opens a book now and then, pick this up from your
library:

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...46199575&itm=1

If you know anyone who'll be an airline passenger in the near future, have
them steal a few barf bags for you. You'll need them. The book describes how
Carter, Reagan and to a lesser extent, Bush-1 totally dropped the ball with
regard to keeping certain countries from developing nuclear weapons, mainly
because it was expedient to do so. You'll learn how Dick Cheney cooked
near-perfect CIA reports so they'd be more useful to the administration.
Stuff like that.


LA and NY Times reporters are not at all biased, either. So everything said
is bound to be the truth and nothing but.

Kind of like what Doug and Harry preach?
--
Red Herring