View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,435
Default If you don't believe that Democrats...

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Red Herring" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:58:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:41:11 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Cancelled because the SecDef had enough sense not to invade the
country of
an ally, especially given how wrong intelligence had been in the
past.

You're the same guy that says we should have paid no attention to
the
intelligence from Iraq.

Jeees, wake up.
If Pakistan was truly an ally, then they would have invited us to go
in and get Bin Laden. They might have even provided additional troops
and equipment for the missio. That's what friends are for.

If they wouldn't let us in, then they are not an ally, but a nation
harboring terrorists. BIG difference.

Oh yes. Any ally would let foreign soldiers come trooping into their
country to capture someone. Horse ****.

Are you saying this could never happen?


Doug,
Are you saying that this should always invade an ally's country to
capture a fugitive?


You never saw me say always, but it doesn't matter. You have lost
touch with the concept being discussed here.


I knew you were going to say that.


ps - since you obviously were out of touch with the concept I was
highlighting, I used the exact opposite of your question to highlight
what a simple minded question you asked.