BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

JoeSpareBedroom

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:39:50 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:22:28 -0500, BAR wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:37:37 -0500, BAR wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:13:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:57:02 -0500, BAR
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:35:47 -0500, BAR
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:50:05 -0500, BAR wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:53:39 -0500, Eisboch wrote:

9/11 was Osama bin Laden's fault.

Eisboch
100% true, but did you think 6 years later he would still be
out and
about? I would argue *that* is Bush's fault.
What would you have done differently to capture OBL? Don't
tell me how
Bush screwed it up and that the Democrats would have done it
better.
What actions would you Thunder have taken to track down OBL
and capture
or kill him?
Two things I can think of right off the top of my head, I
wouldn't of
been sidetracked by invading Iraq, or do you actually think
there were
WMD? Secondly, I would have kept the man who murdered 3000
Americans a
priority.

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really
don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's
whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)

Perhaps, you think differently, but I think the strongest
statement that
can be make in this "War on Terror" is to track down those
that attacked
us.

Have you ever considered that bin Laden, as an individual, is
*not*
important. What is important is the world-wide, religiously
based uprising
against anything or anybody not believing in fundamental Islam.
Bin Laden
may be a vocal centerpiece and symbol, but he by himself is not
that
important.

It would be good to get him for symbolic reasons, but if bin
Laden was
discovered dead tomorrow, nothing much would change.

Bush may actually have his eye on the ball. It's the public
that may be
looking for a simplistic solution.
If we kill OBL he becomes a martyr and is good for recruitment,
for
al-qiada.

Not under MY plan, he doesn't.
Enlighten us please.
Find and kill the *******. Then put his remains in the poured
concrete
foundation of the new World Trade Center.
We already know you want to find him and kill him. What we want to
know
is how you would go about the task of finding OBL?

Our leaders need to stay focused. If they had, we wouldn't be
wondering about how to find him.
You are all talk and not action. You just want something to complain
about.

Thats a fairly bizarre response.

You wont tell us what you would do to track down and capture OBL. You
say that OBL needs to be captured and that GWB has failed us by not
capturing OBL. What would you do or would you have done to capture OBL.

If you are not willing to tell us what your plan to capture OBL then you
are just blowing smoke, sucking up air for no reason or just want to
keep whining about the US not capturing OBL.

You are beginning to show traces of Kanterism.

Yet another bizarre response.

I don't believe I ever suggested that I should personally go and collar
Bin
Laden. I just suggested that the people that should be going after Bin
Laden
have Attention Deficit Disorder and they keep getting sidetracked. If the
president of the United States had the WILL to capture Bin Laden, it would
happen. He simply hasn't applied himself.

Salty, you've got to admit you keep dodging the question.
--
John H

Do you think that if salty hasn't got the details of the proposed mission,
then it cannot be done, even by people who DO know how to do it?

http://freedemocracy.blogspot.com/20...den-still.html