wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:42:11 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
m...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

Psssst! Can I tell you a little secret? GWB already ignores the
sovereignty of other countries. Please don't say silly things about
how we should respect the sovereignty of other countries. If you
insist on saying silly things like that, then you need to explain
how
the invasion of Iraq fits your definition of respecting
sovereignty.

Excuse me. I paid for this computer. I'll say any silly thing I
want.

Eisboch


Really, I need to understand this better. So far, I've interpreted
your
words to mean the following:

"We should respect the sovereignty of other nations, except when we
don't feel like it."

Is that it?
I am not certain what Eisboch meant, but I would say you should
definitely respect the sovereignty of your allies, if you want to keep
them your allies. Pakistan's govt. is doing a real balancing act,
supporting the US, and trying to control the Muslim extremist in their
country. It really doesn't seem to be that hard to understand.



Quiet, Reggie. My question was directed as Eisboch. Don't presume to be
able to explain what he meant.

Joe,
Try to read my post again. I said i am not sure, but then told you what
I
think.

I didn't ask for your input. The question was addressed to Eisboch.


This is usenet. If you want to specifically address just one person,
you really should take it to email.



Reggie is adding nothing but clutter. He knows that. It's his reason for
being here.